Article

The UK government’s proposal to remove Inheritance Tax (IHT) relief on Alternative Investment Market (AIM) shares has sparked considerable debate among investors and financial analysts. This potential policy shift aims to raise substantial revenue but also brings with it significant implications for market volatility, investor behaviour, and long-term investment strategies.

Market Volatility and Inheritance Tax Relief

AIM shares have traditionally been a popular vehicle for mitigating IHT liabilities due to their eligibility for Business Property Relief (BPR), which can reduce Inheritance Tax to zero if the shares are held for more than two years. This relief has made AIM shares particularly attractive to investors seeking to pass on wealth without the burden of a hefty tax bill.

However, the proposed removal of this relief will likely lead to increased market volatility. The primary concern is that investors might rush to sell their AIM holdings to avoid potential future tax liabilities, leading to a significant sell-off. This could depress share prices, exacerbate market instability, and diminish the ability of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to raise capital on favourable terms.

The AIM market, already known for its higher risk and volatility compared to the mainstream market, could see exacerbated liquidity issues. Investors who rely on the tax benefits as a safety net for their high-risk investments may reconsider their positions, leading to reduced market participation and further volatility.

Potential Sell-Off and Economic Impact

The fear of a substantial sell-off is not unfounded. Approximately one-third of AIM shares are held for the purpose ofinheritance planning. If the relief is abolished, there is a real risk that investors will divest their holdings, seeking safer and more tax-efficient investment avenues. This could lead to a sharp decline in AIM market valuations, making it more challenging for companies to attract investment and potentially driving some businesses to delist or seek capital in other jurisdictions.

Moreover, the uncertainty surrounding the potential policy change could deter new investments in AIM, as investors typically seek stable and predictable tax environments. This hesitation could stifle the growth of innovative SMEs that rely on AIM for funding.

Jet 2 share price (Jet2 is among the 20 highest volume stocks on the FTSE AIM 100 Index) 

The Case for Tangible Assets as Legacy Investments

Given the potential upheaval in the AIM market, it is prudent for investors to consider alternative legacy investments. Tangible assets such as real estate, art, and collectibles offer a level of stability and predictability that can be appealing in times of market uncertainty. These assets are not only less susceptible to market volatility but also hold intrinsic value that can appreciate over time .

Real estate, for instance, has historically been a reliable investment, providing both income and capital growth. Art and collectables, while more niche, can also offer substantial returns and diversification benefits. By incorporating tangible assets into their investment portfolios, investors can mitigate risk and ensure that their legacy is preserved and passed on effectively.

The Importance of Diversification

In the face of potential changes to Inheritance Tax relief on AIM shares, diversification becomes even more critical. Investors should not rely solely on AIM shares for inheritance tax planning. Instead, a balanced portfolio that includes both traditional financial instruments and tangible assets can provide more security and flexibility. This diversified approach can help manage risk and provide more stable returns, ensuring that the inheritance left to future generations is both substantial and secure.

Navigating the Changing Landscape

For investors navigating this potential policy change, it is crucial to stay informed and adaptable. Regular consultations with financial advisors and tax professionals can provide updated guidance and strategies tailored to individual circumstances. By staying proactive and considering a broader range of investment options, investors can better protect their assets and legacy.

In conclusion, the proposed removal of IHT relief on AIM shares presents significant challenges and uncertainties for investors. While the policy aims to increase tax revenue, it risks destabilizing the AIM market and deterring investment in high-growth SMEs. Investors should prepare for potential volatility and consider diversifying their portfolios with tangible assets to safeguard their wealth and ensure a stable legacy.

By understanding these dynamics and adjusting their strategies accordingly, investors can navigate the shifting landscape and make informed decisions that protect their financial interests and those of their heirs. Embracing a diversified investment strategy that includes tangible assets can provide a more resilient and enduring approach to managing and preserving wealth for future generations.